I extracted the main points of constructive feedback from the pro-review of my first LIPD for the bennifit of improving this LIPD.

1. You have put a lot of thought/planing into your OP2, and not so much into your other OPs.  
2. It also would be beneficial to connect allies with certain projects/OPs, and to give more information about how you will utilize them. As far as the reader goes, it would be more helpful to have OP reflections at the end, so I have some basis for understanding your reflections. 
3. Your report is also lacking an introduction/ conclusion... it should be readable and understandable outside of the abstract, specifications, reflections, and supporting evidence. Do you have a framework for seeking new projects/ evaluating opportunities that can help you achieve your learning goals? 
4. I think it would have been useful to be a bit more holistic about your year and how you plan on accomplishing your goals/ other outputs. Your project goals on the first page don't exatly line up with your projects 
5. how are you addressing your other personal, professional, and patrix goals?

I extracted the main points of constructive feedback from my self-review of my OP5 Learning Review, where I was assessing my performance over the entire year. Seeing the sections of the PoDAPO review that I felt needed improvement helped me to create this OP, and my tracking systems for the coming cycle.

Note: Looking back over these sections which need improvement, I could have given myself more constructive critisism with solution-based thinking.

Editing shape and size - Accumulative 3.45: Looking back over my OPs I am satisfied with my progress yet I see in the beginning I was less concise and more complex

Articulation and tracking approach - Accumulative 3.5: Though I put a lot of time and energy in trying to explain my Design process, my first attempts I believe were just above the requirements. The iterative process is successful  

Project Design and engagement - Accumulative 3.45: I feel this is one element I have continually improved on as I get more familiar with the process.

OP Design - Accumulative 3.5: My OP design page has been a dynamic part of each of my Project Ops. I have improved steadily in my OP design process

Reflections on UN/Learning Patterns and Skillflexes - Accumulative 3.95:  Unlearning patterns and skillflexes have been thoroughly document in various ways throughout my OP work.

Critical Eval skills and references to good practices - Accumulative 3.5: My strongest part in this criteria is my annotated resource pages and good practices. I need improvement in comparative assessment, though I have used it in several instances.

Leadership Facilitation and mentoring efforts - Accumulative 3.95: I really pushed this edge of teaching /leading and it made this a rich year of growth

Practical benefits to the field - Accumulative 3.5: I feel my ripple effect diagrams (OP2 and 3) is a great tool/illustration for this. I am looking foreword to excelling more in this criteria.

Competence and Attention to Professional Development - Accumulative 3.45: My efforts to improve in this field are one of my key goals and I believe my improvement is evident in my outreach and involvement to build these "skills".

During the time inbetween my OP5 (finishing up my first cycle) and my LIPD (starting my second cycle) I applied to be accepted into an accelerated program. See my Acceleration application page here (I have attached the acceptance letter with feedback at the bottom of the app. page). See my preperation work for this acceleration in my OP5 in the right column here (press back arrow to continue in the OP).

I recently created a page where I am recording solutions I have found to different digital-technical problems I encounter. Which includes an easy way of taking screen shots, html for Mahara, cleaning up memory space in Mahara and more, here is a link to my i-Tech page.