Associate Name: Nicole Vosper
Main Advisor and OP Reviewer: Jennifer Dauksha-English

Output Packet #:  	3	Year: MSc 1
Date Submitted: June 7th, 2014
Date Reviewed: July 22nd, 2014 (Associate was on pause) 
Mark: 75
Grade: B
Time Spent on Review: 3.75 hrs

Nicole,

I'm so grateful to have had the opportunity to read your Output Packet - I'm very impressed once again. Thanks for all of your work on both self and planetary levels. You have advanced so much at managing to maintain significant impact on all levels of engagement.

My review is broken into these sections:
1. Evaluation Form 
2. Comments Per Section

I hope that you find my review helpful. I am honored to get to serve as your Advisor!

Cheers,
Jennifer

OP REVIEW-------------------------

1. EVALUATION FORM-------------------- 

2. COMMENTS PER SECTION---------------

Overview Page
- Nice overview of aim of the OP - very explicit - good for teasing it out so succinctly.
- I've tracked that you followed through with each thread all the way through to your conclusion - well done.
- On timeframe I suggest you not use the word "period" twice in the same sentence - redundant.
- Good overview of container and guidelines on interaction.
- When you add soundtrack - providing links are awesome - didn't you do that last time?
- Nan:)
- On the design of OP - I'm stoked that you renegotiated with yourself! Great map - reveals a lot of your structure. I'd like to hear what your decision making/design process was? Can you articulate your steps in like a flow chart (similar to GaSADIE)?
- Excellent tracking of process and fantastic reflection on data!! I love this:)
- At the bottom of the data you say, "some nice observations," does that mean the above data was not so nice?
- How did you coalesce the data to compare?

Project and Peer
- Once again, very impressed by your tracking - you really need to teach a Gaia Radio call on this!
- Great overview of gains from process. When you include learnings that are constraints, I suggest you always come up with a possible action item (potential solution step).
- I like how you streamlined your roles and accountabilities by just providing an update. Interesting note about solo projects of recent. Is this an edge that you think would be good to refine? Do you think by getting good at that - it may give you even more insight on how to work better with groups?
- I appreciate your reflection on patterns. When you share these, I think it would be helpful to summarize why/how this learning came about.

Political
- When you share in the opening statement about all the types of emerging sub fields within economics - I think they each need a definition (or link, or say defined/explored below). It would also be really cool if you in some way compared all of these in a chart.
- This is an excellent overview of your work during this period. I wouldn't ask that you get rid of or change this process reflection, however I'd like to see you add more content that's applicable to the reader. Could you imagine if your OP was 40% content 20% project process reflection/tracking, 20% project supporting evidence and 20% OP process/pathway reflection? I'm not saying that this is the way it needs to be just noting that your OP seems to be lower on content then I think is ideal. The content would be more geared to teaching someone else about the subject, providing tools and best practices, etc…
- Ok in consideration to the next section on economics and agroecology, I would say that you are now sharing in a way that is teaching, so I guess I would pull back a bit from what I just said. I decided to leave my comments because they are worth considering as an associate and as an advisor.
- Good that you included a note about where the chart is created.
- Nice use of quotations.
- Good note encouraging your intention to prove only surface context about each field and encouraging readers to self forage.
- I like this brief overview and again wish that in some way you'd had considered making a chart to compare what is similar and what is unique about these fields.

Professional
- Excellent use of mind maps to capture livelihood design and the design of your work within specific fields.
- Have you tried using the word constraint instead of threat?
- I think it would be awesome if you added an integrative statement that shows how these different fields fit together perhaps. What's the trunk of these branches - or if not the trunk perhaps they have a very distinct fruit that is shared between all.
- Great overview of skills and professional progress. Is there any way you can link this to your supporting evidence more explicitly?
- When you discuss skills gained you might want to add a note about whether you think that these skills are relevant for anyone going into this field… to add once again that context and value for the reader.

Personal
- Nice use of two design processes for self development - please define them though or add links to glossary/wiki.
- Love the use of x-mind once again.
- Self care as a political act - nice.
- I feel that this page needs some type of conclusive/integrative remark.

Pathway and Next Steps
- Great conclusion that successfully weaves together all the threads of this OP.
- In process reflection you mention the form - go ahead and link it again.
- Nice wrap up on process reflection - did you meet the goals for this OP?
- Under pathway reflection I'd like to see your usual MTMP (oh you have it in support) and incorporation of feedback. Also, where's your guild notes?
- Good integration with pathway connections piece.
- Tracking of next steps! I think this page could use some integrative statement that values what you've shared here.

Supporting Material and Reviews
- Nice resource review as always.
- Gratitude:)
- Excellent support for project!
- Journal entries and digiphon - check!
- You're self review is very informative and reflective - this is exactly what I'm wanting. Great self review comments - I got a lot of perspective about your awareness of these criteria and you're ability to track your progress in each area.
- I'm pleased with the review that you gave Manasi. There was a good balance of appreciation, supportive suggestions, questions, etc… Well done!!