Associate Name: Nicole Vosper
Main Advisor and OP Reviewer: Jennifer Dauksha-English Morgan

Output Packet #:  	3	Year: MSc Capstone
Date Submitted: June 27th, 2017
Date Reviewed: August 22nd, 2017
Mark: 80
Grade: A
Time Spent on Review: 3.75 hrs

Dear Nicole,

This is so exciting Nicole. I loved your research in the field. Fabulous thinking. Powerful engagement.

My review is broken into these sections:
1. Evaluation Form 
2. Comments Per Section

I respect your integrity in managing your pathway. I'm glad to be your advisor!

Cheers,
Jennifer

OP REVIEW-------------------------

1. EVALUATION FORM-------------------- 

(attached)

2. COMMENTS PER SECTION---------------

Commentary
- I really like how you used the drop menu option.
- Super clear navigational cues. I’d add something about columns if that matters.
- Goals of OP - good use of action verbs, and focus very relevant/timely to project. Were these OP goals or project goals? They seem more like project specific. This section could use a sentence context to how you created the OP and your intentions for tracking/reflecting.
- Your word count may be close to 6800, however it’s a very dense read. I don’t imagine that you’re counting media. I’ve already spent over an hour on your first page alone. It’s fine, I think you did good at stating what is included, however consider adding a note to reviewer about where to spend the bulk of energy.
- I love love love your worldviews statement.
- I like the links to PreCapstone phase, yet maybe putting them in bullet points rather than paragraph would make them stand out more for easier access (especially if the reader is looking to find it after the review).
- Powerful purpose statement. Very strategic!
- Love the Empty Cage Design logo!
- I so appreciate how you dive so deep into deconstructing the field of agroecokogy. The OP purpose highlights the aim for your work contributing to the field and as a learner. 
- Good summary of contents.
- Wow! The Agroecologist Portfolio is super impressive!
- Fantastic use of design models and focus for your design endeavors.  Excellent self educational construct and container.
- Nice explanation on your annual cycle of mapping key projects and interventions. How do you interact with that process though? I don’t understand how you track and evaluate your progress.
- Oh wow. Such intense life update. You’ve persevered through so much.
- I’m impressed by your pathway tracking and time management systems you have in place. I like how you added new gains for the OP.
- The skill flex tracking form is so impressive, however I think adding a few sentences outside of the file, to assess the core outcomes of your tracking.
- Output Reflection section is top notch.

Core Report
- Loving the images on the side bars!! Did you mean for it to say text at the top of each column? Looks amazing!
- Well sated introduction that has clear definitions, context and summary of content.
- I’m confused as to why you’re saying the 4th and final project. Are you referring to this OP or your next one?
- So appreciating the section on deconstructing science! What a great intention to focus on scientific literacy!  I really value your thinking on science and how it serves capitalism. Brilliant and poignant statements. Agents of empire! Agreed. Biocolonialism and imperial science  - you’re really diving in deep.
- Wow. This bit on privilege and indigenous knowledge is super patrix busting. I love the piece on situated knowledge. You’re doing a wonderful job contextualizing all of these components to the field. Great external referencing and abstract conceptualization.  So this Integral Ecology model is the same as the Integral Theory, perhaps you might mention the link? Your questions are very useful in helping the reader expand on and hone in on their motivation and focus. Good overview of tools and models.
- Fantastic comparative assessment using the work of Laugksch and PISA. 
- Also, good reflection on adopting multiple lens for engagement/reflection.
- I like how you went from world view to field specific to your own personal design process for professional growth/education. Do these build on each other? Is there a pattern between them?
- This concept of a people’s science is brilliant. We absolutely need this and I’m glad Rafter introduced you to the body of thinking at the IPC 2015;)!
- Nice case study to back up your thoughts.
- This entire thing on knowledge is intense and is so in alignment with my own OP I’m currently focussed on. The topic is oppression. Excited to share and possibly collaborate.
- Explain the difference between references and bibliography.

Appendices
- Brilliant.

Supporting Evidence
- I feel like this page could benefit from an introduction explain the different types of content.
- Excellent resource review.
- Amazed by all your supporting evidence.
- Explicit note on assessment of impact being the focus of OP 4 - that’s fine and good (pathway mgmt.)
- Self care - thank goodness - you’ve needed it. Your path to recovery has been rich yet intense. I’m glad that you’ve found more of a balance and space of homeostasis for healing. Burn out and fatigue are so all-consuming. I think of you often and continue to send you nourishment and comfort energetically.
- Burnout blogs - wow! I had no idea you were tracking all of this. How did you find time to journal in the midst of burn out?!
- I feel that there’s a more graphical way you could’ve shared all these skill flexes, aside from a list.